During the past few weeks, I have been testing out and “kicking the tires”, on Grass Valley’s Edius 6. Edius was originally created by Canopus, and was bought out by Grass Valley.  They have continued to improve upon its structure providing a large selection of codec support. Before I dive into my review, I would like to thank Grass Valley for graciously providing me with this copy of Edius 6.








(Note: This version of Edius 6 is a PC version.) Initial installation was simple enough, using the provided CD with an .exe file.  A surprise in the packaging was the inclusion of the USB key. This USB key is similar to Avid’s dongle for security.  Basically what this means, Eduis will not run without the USB key plugged into the machine. The key must be plugged in before launching the application or nothing will work. A nice security feature when editing on several machines, I will go into that later.
To continue reading this review click the image  below

Adobe Premiere Pro CS4

Also available as an upgrade from previous version ~ £250 inc VAT.

Now that Adobe is heavily locked into a strategy of suites rather than individual applications, most of the company's software gets a revision at the same time. So whilst much of the excitement has been about Photoshop CS4 and its alleged GPU acceleration, Adobe's video apps have new versions as well. This week we look at Adobe's workhorse video editor, Premiere Pro CS4.


As the oldest video editing app on the PC platform, Premiere has an illustrious history. The switch to Premiere Pro accompanied a complete change of the codebase, but the interface has simply evolved. So CS4 doesn't look significantly different from CS3, although it does have a couple of important innovations. The New Project dialog no longer sets an overall format, just your preferred capture configuration. This is because individual sequences within a project can now each have their own base format. This will come in handy if you shoot with a variety of disparate camcorders. You can edit each natively, then nest the sequences together.


But the most significant development ‘under the hood' is that, like Adobe Premiere Elements 7, AVCHD files are now supported. Whilst this is predominately a consumer format, Panasonic in particular has been backing it with professional models, such as the AG-HMC151, which we will be reviewing next week. Consumer models have also reached a level where they could well be called upon for occasional shoots. So Adobe has added AVCHD just in the nick of time.

The delay seems to have been worthwhile, though, as Adobe's implementation is very slick indeed. Editing is extremely fluid. Naturally, frame rates drop more rapidly than with HDV as you add effects and layers, but it's still the most responsive AVCHD editing we've experienced yet. This isn't the only new format support added, either. Premiere Pro can now edit footage from the Red One, Panasonic's P2 cards, and Sony's XDCAM EX and HD, which covers pretty much every professional tapeless format currently available.

 Corel Video Studio X3WHAT'S NEW
Before we get too far into this review, I'd suggest going back and reading my review of Corel VideoStudio Pro X3's predecessor, X2, so you have a frame of reference when I start throwing around terms like "illusion of progress."
From the get-go, you can tell that Corel went back to the drawing board for the new version. The interface has changed and is well abstracted, and it at least seems like this part has been majorly improved.
When you get into the advanced editor, you'll find things have radically changed, even progressed, but it's still not as intuitive as I'd like. The essential order of the timelines remains unchanged, and that was one of my biggest complaints: video timelines go in the order of "Video above Overlay above Title," when the exact opposite order would be more logical.
The reason I showed you the advanced mode first was to give you a taste of what's changed with the familiar; the advanced editor looks a lot like VideoStudio X2. What's really new is the easy mode editor.
EASY MODE? NOT SO MUCH
The easy mode has the trappings of something that could be very functional, but it started downhill for me.
The first thing Corel's software does is search your hard drive for media to edit with. Seems sensible. I went ahead and waited a few minutes for the program to index all my stuff, noting that I have nearly a terabyte of usable data on my system because, hey, I work as a videographer. But I didn't want to hold anything against the program, so eventually I just hit "OK."
Once I got into the program's "desktop," I found that the user interface had been largely streamlined and in many ways for the better. I like the look, and going into the import drop box revealed very easy to understand, very visual icons for getting to what you want to get to. So I did the sensible thing and hunted down a folder on my machine that I knew only had a little over four hours of HDV footage in it. I checked the box next to the folder I wanted to add to the library, and presto...
...it didn't show up.
Oh the swirling icon still powered along at the bottom right corner of the window, but none of my material actually manifested in the library. I waited. Nothing showed up. I waited some more. Nothing showed up. The autosearch having trouble getting everything at the beginning? That I could understand. But, frankly, my computer is far too fast for this to take so long.
I went for the Express Edit of the sample video in the program. It took an abnormally long time to load, and didn't offer any visual cue that it was loading until the Express Edit window finally materialized. I was worried I'd already made the program hang.
Here's where Corel's representatives would probably cry foul: I wound up not spending a whole lot of time trying to figure out how to edit video, and a large part of that is because I had such a devil of a time getting my own footage inside the program.
TOO MUCH GLOSS, NOT ENOUGH SUBSTANCE
Someone's going to accuse me for not having enough patience, but the real disappointment here was that it looked like Corel's developers spent a lot of time working on the user interface and experience for the easy mode. They went back to the drawing board and thought a lot about how their prospective users might muddle their way through the software. I respect and admire that. User experience has been a large part of what's kept Apple doing so well, and the hard lesson Microsoft eventually learned and capitalized on with the release of Windows 7.
Unfortunately, things don't seem to be running quite so well under Corel's hood. My computer has a quad core processor running stable at 3.7 GHz, 8GB of memory, and my source video files sit on a striped RAID (you don't need to know what that is other than to understand it's fast and ideal for high definition editing). I have never used any video editing software on my machine that felt less responsive than Corel VideoStudio Pro X3 does.
When I import existing footage into the program's library, it needs to index it and be done with it. It needs to show up yesterday, not make me wait for minutes on end. When you import existing footage in Adobe Premiere Pro CS4, the footage shows up immediately in your project window, and then a progress bar at the bottom right side of the window shows the footage itself being indexed for easy access. In an ideal situation you do wait for the video to finish indexing, but you know what? At least the program tells you it is indexing.
Right from the primary library view, Corel's software gives you plenty of ways to export your footage, hitting all the right notes and covering the bases. From the editor proper, you can export to all the same places or even pop your project open in the advanced editor.
These features are all great, useful tools, but they aren't going to do you much good if the software itself is largely unresponsive and you have issues importing existing footage off of your own hard drive.
I'm willing to accept the possibility that I got a bad egg. The beauty of free trials is that someone else can download and pop open the software and maybe even have a better experience than I did. I certainly like the changes made to the interface proper and Corel's efforts to make things simpler for the average user. While they do suggest visiting their website for proper tutorials on how to use it, it seems clear to me the developers were looking to make sure just about anyone could jump in and get cracking.